We are on a "highway to climate hell" despite decades of international climate negotiations, according to UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres. Scholarly and political attention has turned to climate clubs as a new governance tool to increase climate ambition (Hovi et al., 2017; Unger et al., 2020; Falkner et al., 2021; Koppenborg, forthcoming). However, scholarship on climate clubs suffers from a lack of conceptual clarity (Falkner et al., 2021) and the growing number of normative climate clubs, such as the Global Methane Pledge and The Climate Club, suffer from a lack of empirical assessment (Unger et al., 2020). This paper asks: What is the nature and role of normative climate clubs in global climate governance?
Answering this question contributes to closing the research gap by mapping the current landscape of 39 existing normative climate clubs and clarifying the concept based on this comprehensive empirical assessment. This paper conducts the first-ever comprehensive mapping of normative climate clubs. While the database is an empirical contribution in itself, visualizing and discussing the collected data in light of scholarly debates about club membership, legitimacy, club goods, relationship with UNFCCC and functions within global climate governance further increases our understanding of normative clubs and their role in global climate politics.